CareConnect-Location-1
Location | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Location |
Comments | |
Location.id | |
Definition |
The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation. Bundles always have an id, though it is usually a generated UUID. |
Location.meta | |
Definition |
The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content may not always be associated with version changes to the resource. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Meta |
Comments | |
Location.implicitRules | |
Definition |
A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Uri |
Is Modifier | True |
Comments |
Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element as much as possible. |
Location.language | |
Definition |
The base language in which the resource is written. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
A human language. The codes SHALL be taken from http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 |
Type | Code |
Comments |
Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute). |
Location.text | |
Definition |
A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource, and may be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Narrative |
Aliases | narrative, html, xhtml, display |
Comments |
Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. |
Location.contained | |
Definition |
These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Resource |
Aliases | inline resources, anonymous resources, contained resources |
Comments |
This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. |
Location.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.modifierExtension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Is Modifier | True |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.identifier(ODS Site Code) | |
Definition |
ODS Site code to identify the organisation at site level. |
Control | 0..1 |
Comments | |
Location.identifier.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.identifier.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.identifier.system | |
Definition | |
Control | 1..* |
Comments | |
Fixed Value | https://fhir.nhs.uk/Id/ods-site-code |
Location.identifier.value | |
Definition | |
Control | 1..* |
Comments | |
Location.identifier(localIdentifier) | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..1 |
Comments | |
Location.identifier.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.identifier.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.identifier.system | |
Definition | |
Control | 1..* |
Comments | |
Fixed Value | https://fhir.nhs.uk/Id/ods-site-code |
Location.identifier.value | |
Definition | |
Control | 1..* |
Comments | |
Location.status | |
Definition |
active | suspended | inactive. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
Indicates whether the location is still in use. The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/location-status |
Type | Code |
Is Modifier | True |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.name | |
Definition |
Name of the location as used by humans. Does not need to be unique. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.description | |
Definition |
Description of the Location, which helps in finding or referencing the place. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Requirements |
Humans need additional information to verify a correct location has been identified. |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.mode | |
Definition |
Indicates whether a resource instance represents a specific location or a class of locations. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
Indicates whether a resource instance represents a specific location or a class of locations. The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/location-mode |
Type | Code |
Is Modifier | True |
Requirements |
When using a Location resource for scheduling or orders, we need to be able to refer to a class of Locations instead of a specific Location. |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.type | |
Definition |
Indicates the type of function performed at the location. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
Indicates the type of function performed at the location. The codes SHALL be taken from the following if appropriate, otherwise an alternate coding may be included instead. http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType |
Type | CodeableConcept |
Comments |
Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. |
Location.type.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.type.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.type.coding | |
Definition |
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Coding |
Requirements |
Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings. |
Comments |
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labelled as UserSelected = true. |
Location.type.coding.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.type.coding.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.type.coding.system | |
Definition |
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Uri |
Requirements |
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. |
Comments |
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously. |
Location.type.coding.version | |
Definition |
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Comments |
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date. |
Location.type.coding.code | |
Definition |
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Code |
Requirements |
Need to refer to a particular code in the system. |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.type.coding.display | |
Definition |
A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Requirements |
Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.type.coding.userSelected | |
Definition |
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Boolean |
Requirements |
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. |
Comments |
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely. |
Location.type.text | |
Definition |
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Requirements |
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. |
Comments |
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings. |
Location.telecom | |
Definition |
The contact details of communication devices available at the location. This can include phone numbers, fax numbers, mobile numbers, email addresses and web sites. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | ContactPoint |
Comments | |
Location.telecom.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.telecom.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.telecom.system | |
Definition |
Telecommunications form for contact point - what communications system is required to make use of the contact. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
Telecommunications form for contact point The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/contact-point-system |
Type | Code |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.telecom.value | |
Definition |
The actual contact point details, in a form that is meaningful to the designated communication system (i.e. phone number or email address). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Requirements |
Need to support legacy numbers that are not in a tightly controlled format. |
Comments |
Additional text data such as phone extension numbers, or notes about use of the contact are sometimes included in the value. |
Location.telecom.use | |
Definition |
Identifies the purpose for the contact point. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
Use of contact point The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/contact-point-use |
Type | Code |
Is Modifier | True |
Requirements |
Need to track the way a person uses this contact, so a user can choose which is appropriate for their purpose. |
Comments |
This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary or old contact etc.for a current/permanent one. Applications can assume that a contact is current unless it explicitly says that it is temporary or old. |
Location.telecom.rank | |
Definition |
Specifies a preferred order in which to use a set of contacts. Contacts are ranked with lower values coming before higher values. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | PositiveInt |
Comments |
Note that rank does not necessarily follow the order in which the contacts are represented in the instance. |
Location.telecom.period | |
Definition |
Time period when the contact point was/is in use. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Period |
Comments |
This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration. |
Location.telecom.period.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.telecom.period.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.telecom.period.start | |
Definition |
The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | DateTime |
Comments |
If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known. |
Location.telecom.period.end | |
Definition |
The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | DateTime |
Comments |
The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03. |
Location.address | |
Definition |
Physical location. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Address |
Requirements |
If locations can be visited, we need to keep track of their address. |
Comments |
This was kept as 0..1 as there is no use property on the address, so wouldn't be able to identify different address types. |
Location.address.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.address.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.address.use | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Comments | |
Example | work |
Location.address.type | |
Definition |
Distinguishes between physical addresses (those you can visit) and mailing addresses (e.g. PO Boxes and care-of addresses). Most addresses are both. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
The type of an address (physical / postal) The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/address-type |
Type | Code |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Example | both |
Location.address.text | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Comments | |
Example | Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS |
Location.address.line | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Comments | |
Example | Denmark Hill |
Location.address.city | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Comments | |
Example | London |
Location.address.district | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Comments | |
Example | |
Location.address.postalCode | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Comments | |
Example | SE5 9RS |
Location.address.country | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Comments | |
Example | GBR |
Location.address.period | |
Definition |
Time period when address was/is in use. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Period |
Requirements |
Allows addresses to be placed in historical context. |
Comments |
This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration. |
Example | Hl7.Fhir.Model.Period |
Location.address.period.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.address.period.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.address.period.start | |
Definition |
The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | DateTime |
Comments |
If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known. |
Location.address.period.end | |
Definition |
The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | DateTime |
Comments |
The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03. |
Location.physicalType | |
Definition |
Physical form of the location, e.g. building, room, vehicle, road. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Binding |
Physical form of the location For example codes, see http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/location-physical-type ; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable |
Type | CodeableConcept |
Requirements |
For purposes of showing relevant locations in queries, we need to categorize locations. |
Comments |
Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination. |
Location.physicalType.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.physicalType.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.physicalType.coding | |
Definition |
A reference to a code defined by a terminology system. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Coding |
Requirements |
Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings. |
Comments |
Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labelled as UserSelected = true. |
Location.physicalType.coding.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.physicalType.coding.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.physicalType.coding.system | |
Definition |
The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Uri |
Requirements |
Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol. |
Comments |
The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously. |
Location.physicalType.coding.version | |
Definition |
The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Comments |
Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date. |
Location.physicalType.coding.code | |
Definition |
A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Code |
Requirements |
Need to refer to a particular code in the system. |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.physicalType.coding.display | |
Definition |
A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Requirements |
Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system. |
Comments |
Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size |
Location.physicalType.coding.userSelected | |
Definition |
Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Boolean |
Requirements |
This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing. |
Comments |
Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely. |
Location.physicalType.text | |
Definition |
A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Requirements |
The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source. |
Comments |
Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings. |
Location.position | |
Definition |
The absolute geographic location of the Location, expressed using the WGS84 datum (This is the same co-ordinate system used in KML). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | BackboneElement |
Requirements |
For mobile applications and automated route-finding knowing the exact location of the Location is required. |
Comments | |
Location.position.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.position.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.position.modifierExtension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Is Modifier | True |
Aliases | extensions, user content, modifiers |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.position.longitude | |
Definition |
Longitude. The value domain and the interpretation are the same as for the text of the longitude element in KML (see notes below). |
Control | 1..1 ? |
Type | Decimal |
Comments |
Do not use a IEEE type floating point type, instead use something that works like a true decimal, with inbuilt precision (e.g. Java BigInteger) |
Location.position.latitude | |
Definition |
Latitude. The value domain and the interpretation are the same as for the text of the latitude element in KML (see notes below). |
Control | 1..1 ? |
Type | Decimal |
Comments |
Do not use a IEEE type floating point type, instead use something that works like a true decimal, with inbuilt precision (e.g. Java BigInteger) |
Location.position.altitude | |
Definition |
Altitude. The value domain and the interpretation are the same as for the text of the altitude element in KML (see notes below). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Decimal |
Comments |
Do not use a IEEE type floating point type, instead use something that works like a true decimal, with inbuilt precision (e.g. Java BigInteger) |
Location.managingOrganization | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Type | https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/StructureDefinition/CareConnect-Organization-1 |
Comments | |
Location.managingOrganization.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.managingOrganization.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.managingOrganization.reference | |
Definition |
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Comments |
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server. |
Location.managingOrganization.display | |
Definition |
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Comments |
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it. |
Location.partOf | |
Definition | |
Control | 0..* |
Type | https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/StructureDefinition/CareConnect-Location-1 |
Comments | |
Location.partOf.id | |
Definition |
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | Id |
Comments |
RFC 4122 |
Location.partOf.extension | |
Definition |
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* ? |
Type | Extension |
Aliases | extensions, user content |
Comments |
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
Location.partOf.reference | |
Definition |
A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Comments |
Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server. |
Location.partOf.display | |
Definition |
Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference. |
Control | 0..1 ? |
Type | String |
Comments |
This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it. |