DocumentReference

ITK-RelatedPerson-1

ITK-RelatedPerson-1

RelatedPerson
Definition
Control 0..*
Type RelatedPerson
Comments
RelatedPerson.id
Definition

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation. Bundles always have an id, though it is usually a generated UUID.

RelatedPerson.meta
Definition

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content may not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Meta
Comments
RelatedPerson.implicitRules
Definition

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Uri
Is Modifier True
Comments

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element as much as possible.

RelatedPerson.language
Definition

The base language in which the resource is written.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

A human language.

The codes SHALL be taken from http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47

Type Code
Comments

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

RelatedPerson.text
Definition

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource, and may be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Narrative
Aliases narrative, html, xhtml, display
Comments

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative.

RelatedPerson.contained
Definition

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

Control 0..*
Type Resource
Aliases inline resources, anonymous resources, contained resources
Comments

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again.

RelatedPerson.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.modifierExtension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Is Modifier True
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier
Definition

Identifier for a person within a particular scope.

Control 0..* ?
Type Identifier
Requirements

People are known by a variety of ids. Some institutions maintain several, and most collect identifiers for exchange with other organizations concerning the patient. Examples are national person identifier and local identifier.

Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.use
Definition

The purpose of this identifier.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/DSTU2/valueset-identifier-use.html

Type Code
Is Modifier True
Requirements

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary id for a permanent one. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type
Definition

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

The codes SHALL be taken from the following if appropriate, otherwise an alternate coding may be included instead. http://hl7.org/fhir/DSTU2/valueset-identifier-type.html

Type CodeableConcept
Requirements

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

Comments

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding
Definition

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Control 0..* ?
Type Coding
Requirements

Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings.

Comments

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labelled as UserSelected = true.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Uri
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.version
Definition

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Code
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.userSelected
Definition

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Boolean
Requirements

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Comments

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.text
Definition

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Comments

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

RelatedPerson.identifier.system
Definition

Establishes the namespace in which set of possible id values is unique.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Uri
Requirements

There are many sequences of identifiers. To perform matching, we need to know what sequence we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular sequence or set of unique identifiers.

Comments

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_resource_identifier

Example http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient or urn:ietf:rfc:3986 if the Identifier.value itself is a full uri
RelatedPerson.identifier.value
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.period
Definition

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner
Definition
Control 0..*
Type https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/StructureDefinition/CareConnect-Organization-1
Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.reference
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.display
Definition

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

RelatedPerson.patient
Definition
Control 0..*
Type https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/StructureDefinition/CareConnect-Patient-1
Comments
RelatedPerson.patient.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.patient.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.patient.reference
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.patient.display
Definition

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

RelatedPerson.relationship
Definition

recipientRoleCode uses a code from the RecipientNonClinicalPersonType vocabulary to describe the role of the non clinical person who is the recipient.

Control 1..*
Binding None Specified
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.relationship.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.relationship.coding
Definition
Control 1..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.system
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.code
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.display
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.name
Definition

A name associated with the person.

Control 0..1 ?
Type HumanName
Requirements

Related persons need to be identified by name, but it is uncommon to need details about multiple other names for that person.

Comments

Names may be changed, or repudiated, or people may have different names in different contexts. Names may be divided into parts of different type that have variable significance depending on context, though the division into parts does not always matter. With personal names, the different parts may or may not be imbued with some implicit meaning; various cultures associate different importance with the name parts and the degree to which systems must care about name parts around the world varies widely.

RelatedPerson.name.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.name.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.name.use
Definition
Control 0..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.name.text
Definition

A full text representation of the name.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

A renderable, unencoded form.

Comments

Can provide both a text representation and structured parts.

RelatedPerson.name.family
Definition
Control 0..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.name.given
Definition

Given name.

Control 0..* ?
Type String
Aliases first name, middle name
Comments

If only initials are recorded, they may be used in place of the full name. Not called "first name" since given names do not always come first.

RelatedPerson.name.prefix
Definition
Control 0..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.name.suffix
Definition

Part of the name that is acquired as a title due to academic, legal, employment or nobility status, etc. and that appears at the end of the name.

Control 0..* ?
Type String
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.name.period
Definition

Indicates the period of time when this name was valid for the named person.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Requirements

Allows names to be placed in historical context.

Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.name.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.name.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.name.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.name.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.telecom
Definition

A contact detail for the person, e.g. a telephone number or an email address.

Control 0..* ?
Type ContactPoint
Requirements

People have (primary) ways to contact them in some way such as phone, email.

Comments

Person may have multiple ways to be contacted with different uses or applicable periods. May need to have options for contacting the person urgently, and also to help with identification.

RelatedPerson.telecom.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.telecom.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.telecom.system
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.telecom.value
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.telecom.use
Definition
Control 0..*
Binding
Comments
RelatedPerson.telecom.rank
Definition

Specifies a preferred order in which to use a set of contacts. Contacts are ranked with lower values coming before higher values.

Control 0..1 ?
Type PositiveInt
Comments

Note that rank does not necessarily follow the order in which the contacts are represented in the instance.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period
Definition

Time period when the contact point was/is in use.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.gender
Definition

Administrative Gender - the gender that the person is considered to have for administration and record keeping purposes.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

The gender of a person used for administrative purposes.

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/DSTU2/valueset-administrative-gender.html

Type Code
Requirements

Needed for identification of the person, in combination with (at least) name and birth date.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.birthDate
Definition

The date on which the related person was born.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Date
Comments
RelatedPerson.address
Definition

Address where the related person can be contacted or visited.

Control 0..* ?
Type Address
Requirements

Need to keep track where the related person can be contacted per postal mail or visited.

Comments

Note: address is for postal addresses, not physical locations.

RelatedPerson.address.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.address.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.address.use
Definition
Control 0..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.address.type
Definition

Distinguishes between physical addresses (those you can visit) and mailing addresses (e.g. PO Boxes and care-of addresses). Most addresses are both.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

The type of an address (physical / postal)

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/DSTU2/valueset-address-type.html

Type Code
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.address.text
Definition

A full text representation of the address.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

A renderable, unencoded form.

Comments

Can provide both a text representation and parts.

RelatedPerson.address.line
Definition

This component contains the house number, apartment number, street name, street direction, P.O. Box number, delivery hints, and similar address information.

Control 0..* ?
Type String
Requirements

home | work | temp | old - purpose of this address.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.address.city
Definition

The name of the city, town, village or other community or delivery center.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Aliases Municpality
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.address.district
Definition

The name of the administrative area (county).

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Aliases County
Comments

District is sometimes known as county, but in some regions 'county' is used in place of city (municipality), so county name should be conveyed in city instead.

RelatedPerson.address.postalCode
Definition

A postal code designating a region defined by the postal service.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Aliases Zip
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.address.country
Definition

Country - a nation as commonly understood or generally accepted.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

ISO 3166 3 letter codes can be used in place of a full country name.

RelatedPerson.address.period
Definition

Time period when address was/is in use.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Requirements

Allows addresses to be placed in historical context.

Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

Example Hl7.Fhir.Model.Period
RelatedPerson.address.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.address.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.address.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.address.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.period
Definition

The period of time that this relationship is considered to be valid. If there are no dates defined, then the interval is unknown.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.