InformationAndAdviceGiven

DCH-RelatedPerson-1

DCH-RelatedPerson-1

RelatedPerson
Definition
Control 0..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.id
Definition

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation. Bundles always have an id, though it is usually a generated UUID.

RelatedPerson.meta
Definition

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content may not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Meta
Comments
RelatedPerson.implicitRules
Definition

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Uri
Is Modifier True
Comments

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element as much as possible.

RelatedPerson.language
Definition

The base language in which the resource is written.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

A human language.

The codes SHALL be taken from http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47

Type Code
Comments

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

RelatedPerson.text
Definition

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource, and may be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Narrative
Aliases narrative, html, xhtml, display
Comments

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative.

RelatedPerson.contained
Definition

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

Control 0..*
Type Resource
Aliases inline resources, anonymous resources, contained resources
Comments

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again.

RelatedPerson.extension(householdMember)
Definition
Control 1..1
Type Extension
Comments
RelatedPerson.extension(link)
Definition
Control 0..1
Type Extension
Comments
RelatedPerson.modifierExtension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Is Modifier True
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier
Definition
Control 1..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.use
Definition

The purpose of this identifier.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/identifier-use

Type Code
Is Modifier True
Requirements

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary id for a permanent one. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type
Definition

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

The codes SHALL be taken from the following if appropriate, otherwise an alternate coding may be included instead. http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/identifier-type

Type CodeableConcept
Requirements

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

Comments

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding
Definition

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Control 0..* ?
Type Coding
Requirements

Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings.

Comments

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labelled as UserSelected = true.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Uri
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.version
Definition

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Code
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.coding.userSelected
Definition

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Boolean
Requirements

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Comments

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

RelatedPerson.identifier.type.text
Definition

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Comments

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

RelatedPerson.identifier.system
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.value
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.period
Definition

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.identifier.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner
Definition
Control 0..*
Type https://fhir.nhs.uk/StructureDefinition/CareConnect-DCH-Organization-1
Comments
RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.reference
Definition

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

RelatedPerson.identifier.assigner.display
Definition

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

RelatedPerson.patient
Definition
Control 0..*
Type https://fhir.nhs.uk/StructureDefinition/CareConnect-DCH-Patient-1
Comments
RelatedPerson.patient.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.patient.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.patient.reference
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.patient.display
Definition

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

RelatedPerson.relationship
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.relationship.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.relationship.coding
Definition
Control 1..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.system
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.version
Definition

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.code
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.display
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.relationship.coding.userSelected
Definition

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Boolean
Requirements

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Comments

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

RelatedPerson.relationship.text
Definition

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Comments

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

RelatedPerson.name
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.name.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.name.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.name.use
Definition

Identifies the purpose for this name.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

The use of a human name

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-use

Type Code
Is Modifier True
Requirements

Allows the appropriate name for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of names.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary or old name etc.for a current/permanent one. Applications can assume that a name is current unless it explicitly says that it is temporary or old.

RelatedPerson.name.text
Definition

A full text representation of the name.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

A renderable, unencoded form.

Comments

Can provide both a text representation and structured parts.

RelatedPerson.name.family
Definition
Control 1..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.name.given
Definition
Control 1..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.name.prefix
Definition

Part of the name that is acquired as a title due to academic, legal, employment or nobility status, etc. and that appears at the start of the name.

Control 0..* ?
Type String
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.name.suffix
Definition

Part of the name that is acquired as a title due to academic, legal, employment or nobility status, etc. and that appears at the end of the name.

Control 0..* ?
Type String
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.name.period
Definition

Indicates the period of time when this name was valid for the named person.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Requirements

Allows names to be placed in historical context.

Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.name.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.name.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.name.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.name.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.telecom
Definition
Control 0..1
Must Support True
Comments
RelatedPerson.telecom.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.telecom.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.telecom.system
Definition

Telecommunications form for contact point - what communications system is required to make use of the contact.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

Telecommunications form for contact point

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/contact-point-system

Type Code
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.telecom.value
Definition

The actual contact point details, in a form that is meaningful to the designated communication system (i.e. phone number or email address).

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

Need to support legacy numbers that are not in a tightly controlled format.

Comments

Additional text data such as phone extension numbers, or notes about use of the contact are sometimes included in the value.

RelatedPerson.telecom.use
Definition

Identifies the purpose for the contact point.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

Use of contact point

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/contact-point-use

Type Code
Is Modifier True
Requirements

Need to track the way a person uses this contact, so a user can choose which is appropriate for their purpose.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary or old contact etc.for a current/permanent one. Applications can assume that a contact is current unless it explicitly says that it is temporary or old.

RelatedPerson.telecom.rank
Definition

Specifies a preferred order in which to use a set of contacts. Contacts are ranked with lower values coming before higher values.

Control 0..1 ?
Type PositiveInt
Comments

Note that rank does not necessarily follow the order in which the contacts are represented in the instance.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period
Definition

Time period when the contact point was/is in use.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.telecom.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.gender
Definition
Control 1..*
Binding
Comments
RelatedPerson.birthDate
Definition
Control 1..*
Comments
RelatedPerson.address
Definition
Control 0..1
Must Support True
Comments
RelatedPerson.address.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.address.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.address.use
Definition

The purpose of this address.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

The use of an address

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/address-use

Type Code
Is Modifier True
Requirements

Allows an appropriate address to be chosen from a list of many.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary or old address etc.for a current/permanent one. Applications can assume that an address is current unless it explicitly says that it is temporary or old.

Example home
RelatedPerson.address.type
Definition

Distinguishes between physical addresses (those you can visit) and mailing addresses (e.g. PO Boxes and care-of addresses). Most addresses are both.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

The type of an address (physical / postal)

The codes SHALL be taken from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/address-type

Type Code
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

Example both
RelatedPerson.address.text
Definition

A full text representation of the address.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

A renderable, unencoded form.

Comments

Can provide both a text representation and parts.

Example 137 Nowhere Street, Erewhon 9132
RelatedPerson.address.line
Definition

This component contains the house number, apartment number, street name, street direction, P.O. Box number, delivery hints, and similar address information.

Control 0..* ?
Type String
Requirements

home | work | temp | old - purpose of this address.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

Example 137 Nowhere Street
RelatedPerson.address.city
Definition

The name of the city, town, village or other community or delivery center.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Aliases Municpality
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

Example Erewhon
RelatedPerson.address.district
Definition

The name of the administrative area (county).

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Aliases County
Comments

District is sometimes known as county, but in some regions 'county' is used in place of city (municipality), so county name should be conveyed in city instead.

Example Madison
RelatedPerson.address.state
Definition

Sub-unit of a country with limited sovereignty in a federally organized country. A code may be used if codes are in common use (i.e. US 2 letter state codes).

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Aliases Province, Territory
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

RelatedPerson.address.postalCode
Definition

A postal code designating a region defined by the postal service.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Aliases Zip
Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

Example 9132
RelatedPerson.address.country
Definition

Country - a nation as commonly understood or generally accepted.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Comments

ISO 3166 3 letter codes can be used in place of a full country name.

RelatedPerson.address.period
Definition

Time period when address was/is in use.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Requirements

Allows addresses to be placed in historical context.

Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

Example Hl7.Fhir.Model.Period
RelatedPerson.address.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.address.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.address.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.address.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.

RelatedPerson.photo
Definition
Control 0..1
Comments
RelatedPerson.photo.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.photo.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.photo.contentType
Definition

Identifies the type of the data in the attachment and allows a method to be chosen to interpret or render the data. Includes mime type parameters such as charset where appropriate.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

The mime type of an attachment. Any valid mime type is allowed.

The codes SHALL be taken from http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp13.txt

Type Code
Requirements

Processors of the data need to be able to know how to interpret the data.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

Example text/plain; charset=UTF-8, image/png
RelatedPerson.photo.language
Definition

The human language of the content. The value can be any valid value according to BCP 47.

Control 0..1 ?
Binding

A human language.

The codes SHALL be taken from http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47

Type Code
Requirements

Users need to be able to choose between the languages in a set of attachments.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

Example en-AU
RelatedPerson.photo.data
Definition

The actual data of the attachment - a sequence of bytes. In XML, represented using base64.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Base64Binary
Requirements

The data needs to able to be transmitted inline.

Comments

The base64-encoded data SHALL be expressed in the same character set as the base resource XML or JSON.

RelatedPerson.photo.url
Definition

An alternative location where the data can be accessed.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Uri
Requirements

The data needs to be transmitted by reference.

Comments

If both data and url are provided, the url SHALL point to the same content as the data contains. Urls may be relative references or may reference transient locations such as a wrapping envelope using cid: though this has ramifications for using signatures. Relative URLs are interpreted relative to the service url, like a resource reference, rather than relative to the resource itself. If a URL is provided, it SHALL resolve to actual data.

Example http://www.acme.com/logo-small.png
RelatedPerson.photo.size
Definition

The number of bytes of data that make up this attachment.

Control 0..1 ?
Type UnsignedInt
Requirements

Representing the size allows applications to determine whether they should fetch the content automatically in advance, or refuse to fetch it at all.

Comments

The number of bytes is redundant if the data is provided as a base64binary, but is useful if the data is provided as a url reference.

RelatedPerson.photo.hash
Definition

The calculated hash of the data using SHA-1. Represented using base64.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Base64Binary
Requirements

Included so that applications can verify that the contents of a location have not changed and so that a signature of the content can implicitly sign the content of an image without having to include the data in the instance or reference the url in the signature.

Comments

A stream of bytes, base64 encoded

RelatedPerson.photo.title
Definition

A label or set of text to display in place of the data.

Control 0..1 ?
Type String
Requirements

Applications need a label to display to a human user in place of the actual data if the data cannot be rendered or perceived by the viewer.

Comments

Note that FHIR strings may not exceed 1MB in size

Example Official Corporate Logo
RelatedPerson.photo.creation
Definition

The date that the attachment was first created.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Requirements

This is often tracked as an integrity issue for use of the attachment.

Comments
RelatedPerson.period
Definition

The period of time that this relationship is considered to be valid. If there are no dates defined, then the interval is unknown.

Control 0..1 ?
Type Period
Comments

This is not a duration - that's a measure of time (a separate type), but a duration that occurs at a fixed value of time. A Period specifies a range of time; the context of use will specify whether the entire range applies (e.g. "the patient was an inpatient of the hospital for this time range") or one value from the range applies (e.g. "give to the patient between these two times"). If duration is required, specify the type as Interval|Duration.

RelatedPerson.period.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).

Control 0..1 ?
Type Id
Comments

RFC 4122

RelatedPerson.period.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control 0..* ?
Type Extension
Aliases extensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

RelatedPerson.period.start
Definition

The start of the period. The boundary is inclusive.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

If the low element is missing, the meaning is that the low boundary is not known.

RelatedPerson.period.end
Definition

The end of the period. If the end of the period is missing, it means that the period is ongoing. The start may be in the past, and the end date in the future, which means that period is expected/planned to end at that time.

Control 0..1 ?
Type DateTime
Comments

The high value includes any matching date/time. i.e. 2012-02-03T10:00:00 is in a period that has a end value of 2012-02-03.